Ex parte VASSIGH et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-0876                                                        
          Application 08/269,703                                                      

               which are individually displayed and which describe each               
               choice icon of the first overlay, wherein each of the                  
               additional overlays is displayed after the operator has                
               selected a corresponding choice icon on the first overlay              
               using the first keypad.                                                

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
               Unno                          4,893,237      January 9,                
          1990                                                                        
               Norwood                  5,063,600     November 5, 1991                
               Fujita et al. (Fujita)   5,122,787        June 16, 1992                
               Vassigh et al. (Vassigh)      5,297,030       March 22,                
          1994                                                                        
               Fukatsu                  5,302,811       April 12, 1994                
               Claims 1, 2, and 4-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
          § 102(e) as being anticipated by Vassigh.                                   
               Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Vassigh and Fujita.                                       
               Claims 7-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Vassigh and Fukatsu.                                
               Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over Vassigh and Fukatsu, as applied in the              
          rejection of claim 8, further in view of Norwood.                           
               Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over Vassigh and Fukatsu, as applied in               
          the rejection of claims 7 and 8, further in view of Unno.                   


                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007