Ex parte PARKS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0916                                                        
          Application 08/331,435                                                      


          particularly, the invention is directed to the manner in which              
          the PFET is charged and discharged to effect bipolar                        
          operation.                                                                  
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A driver, comprising:                                              
               (a) first and second power supply inputs;                              
               (b) an output;                                                         
               (c) a first switch directly between said first power                   
          supply input and said output;                                               
               (d) a second switch coupled between said second power                  
          supply input and a passive overshoot circuit, said overshoot                
          circuit coupled to said output; and                                         
               (e) a switch input coupled to said first and second                    
          switches.                                                                   
                                                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Uenishi                       5,140,201          Aug. 18, 1992              
          Jacobson                      5,264,736          Nov. 23, 1993              
          Kayser et al. (Kayser)        5,265,003          Nov. 23, 1993              
          The following rejections are before us in this appeal:                      
                                                                                     
          1. Claims 1-4, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35                            
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Uenishi.                 
          2. Claims 1, 2, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35                           
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007