Appeal No. 1998-0929
Application 08/469,770
Benton, “White-Light Transmission/Reflection Holographic
Imaging,” Applications Of Holography And Optical Data
Processing, Edited by Marom et al., 1977 by Pergamon Press,
pages 401-409.
The admitted prior art described in appellant’s specification.
The following rejections are before us on appeal:
1. Claims 30-34, 36, 38, 40-44, 46, 48, 50-52, 55, 57-
60, 63 and 65-74 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Dainippon in view of Ward
and the admitted prior art.
2. Claims 53 and 61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Dainippon in
view of Ward and the admitted prior art, and further in view
of Benton.
3. Claims 35, 39, 45, 49, 54, 56, 62 and 64 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
teachings of Dainippon in view of Ward and the admitted prior
art, and further in view of Haugen.
4. Claims 37 and 47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007