THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 9 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CASEY S. A. COLEY, WILLIAM L. FOSTER and ARTHUR L. FUMAROLO ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0937 Application No. 08/415,911 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 14, all of the claims pending in the application. The invention pertains to the operational control of a radio communication system and, more particularly, to anPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007