THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUKO TOMITA, SATO MASAYOSHI,
TAKASHI IIJIMA and HIDEO OHTA
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1020
Application No. 08/381,4231
____________
HEARD: November 1, 1999
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 6, 21 and 24. In an amendment after
final rejection (Paper No. 26, filed August 1, 1996), which
has been entered (advisory action, Paper No. 27), claims 4, 5
Application for patent filed January 31, 1995. According to the1
appellants, the application is a division of Application No. 08/101,488, filed
August 3, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007