Ex parte MASHBURN - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1998-1068                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/472,833                                                                                                             



                                                                   The Invention                                                                        

                          The invention relates to a method for forming thin films in which a deposition or material                                    

                 addition environment is separate from a film crystallization or growth environment.  (Specification, p. 1,                             

                 lines 2-8).  By separating the environments each process can be individually optimized.   (Specification,                              

                 p. 4, lines 13-15).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the Appellant’s                                 

                 Brief.  Independent claim 19 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:                                                    

                          19.      A method for forming thin films comprising the steps of:                                                             

                                   containing a target material in a first container having an interior environment maintained                          
                          at a first temperature and pressure;                                                                                          

                                   containing a substrate in a second container having an interior environment maintained                               
                          at a second temperature and pressure; and                                                                                     

                                   periodically exposing the substrate to the environment of the first container while                                  
                          simultaneously exposing the target to a laser beam of sufficient energy to form an ablation plume                             
                          in the first container that extends into the second chamber to thereby deposit material from the                              
                          plume onto the substrate.                                                                                                     


                          We note that claim 19 recites “extends into the second chamber.”  While it is clear that the                                  

                 language “the second chamber” refers to the “second container,”  appellant may find it advisable to                                    

                 rewrite the claim such that the language of the claim is internally consistent.                                                        





                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007