Ex parte JOSHI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1095                                                        
          Application No. 08/367,565                                                  

               The disclosed invention relates to a soft metal                        
          conductor.  The soft metal in the soft metal conductor is                   
          selected from the group consisting of Al, Cu and Ag.                        
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1. A soft metal conductor comprising an upper-most layer               
          consisting of grains capable of providing a substantially                   
          scratch-free planar surface upon polishing in a subsequent                  
          chemical mechanical polishing step, said soft metal is                      
          selected from the group consisting of Al, Cu, Ag, binary and                
          ternary alloys of Al, Cu and Ag.                                            
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Kikkawa                  5,345,108                     Sept. 6,             
          1994                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 3, 5 through 14, 16 through 20, 39 and                
          40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being                         
          anticipated by Kikkawa.                                                     
               Reference is made to the final rejection, the brief and                
          the answer for the respective positions of the appellants and               
          the examiner.                                                               
                                       OPINION                                        
               The 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5              
          through 14, 16 through 20, 39 and 40 is reversed.                           


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007