Appeal No. 1998-1259
Application No. 08/264,817
obviousness of the invention set forth. Accordingly, we
affirm the stated rejection of claims 1-8 and 11-31 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103.
It is our view, with respect to claims 9-10, after
consideration of the record before us, that the evidence
relied upon and the level of skill in the particular art would
not have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art the
obviousness of the invention. Accordingly, we reverse the
rejection of claims 9-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The disclosed invention generally pertains to wireless
communication devices having alert generators. Specifically,
a wireless communications device is disclosed which generates
a particular tactile alert pattern as one of a plurality of
distinctive tactile alert patterns when a particular
communications signal is received.
With respect to claims 1-5, 7, 8 and 13-31, only claim 1
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007