Appeal No. 1998-1308
Application No. 08/469,397
The examiner further relies on the admitted prior art at
page 1 in the specification.
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or in
the alternative 35 U.S.C. § 103 as anticipated by or obvious
over Wolf.
Claims 1, 3, 6, and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over Brambach in view of Wolf.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Wolf and Brambach and further in view of the
admitted prior art. For the details of the appellants' and
the examiner's arguments, with respect to the rejections on
appeal, reference is made to the appeal brief and examiner's
answer for a full statement thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully reviewed the rejections on appeal in
light of the arguments of appellants and the examiner. As a
result of this review, we have reached the determination that
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007