Ex parte CONOLLY et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
          today                                                                       
               (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and               
               (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                                                       Paper No. 28                   


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    

                       Ex parte BRENDAN CONOLLY, JAMIE KALIKOW                        
                                 and PETER C. LEEDS                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1998-1329                                  
                               Application 08/642,595                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                 HEARD: May 16, 2000                                  
                                  ________________                                    

          Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO and BARRY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s                       

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007