Ex parte LAVALLEE - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-1337                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/351,102                                                                                                                 



                                   The references relied on by the Examiner are as                                                                      
                 follows:                                                                                                                               
                 Robinson                       5,339,172        Aug. 16, 1994                                                                          
                 Kimura et al. (Kimura)         5,392,362        Feb. 21, 1995                                                                          
                                                                                                                                                       


                                   Claims 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 stand rejected                                                                   
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Kimura.  Claim 6                                                                         
                 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                                                            
                 over Kimura.  Claims 7 and 13 through 20 stand rejected under                                                                          
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kimura in view of                                                                           
                 Robinson.                                                                                                                              
                                   Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the                                                                 
                 Examiner, we make reference to the briefs  and answer for the             2                                                            
                 details thereof.                                                                                                                       


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            



                          2Appellant filed an appeal brief on June 3, 1997.                                                                             
                 Appellant filed a reply brief on October 3, 1997.  The                                                                                 
                 Examiner mailed a communication on November 12, 1997 stating                                                                           
                 that the reply brief has been entered and considered but no                                                                            
                 further response by the Examiner is deemed necessary.                                                                                  
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007