THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BRUNO G. ROBERT
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-1341
Application 08/358,792
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, HAIRSTON, FLEMING and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 3 through 7, 10, 11, 14
through 34 and 36 through 38. Claims 8, 9, 12, 13 and 35 are objected to. Claims 1 and 2
have been canceled.
The invention relates to a system for tracking a target using mobile tracking
stations. On page 9 of the specification, Appellant identifies that the target has a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007