Appeal No. 1998-1345 Application 08/362,318 the audio and video and does not just "block[] the audio information from being played back"), the result is performed in a different way by the claimed invention which operates directly on the text source or audio information. For these reasons, we conclude that the Examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. The rejection of claims 3 and 4 is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007