Appeal No. 1998-1357
Application No. 08/348,744
Claim 108 additionally stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Kettlewell.
Claim 108 also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being clearly anticipated by Johnston.
Claims 109, 110, 114, 118, 122, 126, 128, 132, 138 and
139
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Lindquist.
Claims 110, 118, 132 and 139 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Searle.
Claims 110, 118 and 132 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kettlewell.
Claims 110, 118 and 132 also stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Johnston.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007