Ex parte RHEE - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
           for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                 Paper No. 23         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte SUNG S. RHEE                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1386                                 
                              Application No. 08/269,156                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before THOMAS, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the final rejection of claims 1, 6-9, 12, 14-17, and 21.               
          We reverse.                                                                 


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The invention at issue in this appeal relates to                       
          handwriting recognition.  Computer-implemented recognition                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007