Ex parte CRANE et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-1397                                      Page 12           
          Application No. 08/482,905                                                  


          § 103(a) as obvious over Westland in view of Izeki further in               
          view of Mita.                                                               









                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               In summary, the rejection of claims 21-22, 26-27, 29-30,               
          and 37-42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Westland;                
          the rejection of claims 23-25 and 31-34 under 35 U.S.C. §                   
          103(a) as obvious over Westland in view of Izeki; the                       
          rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over              
          Westland in view of Mita; and the rejection of claims 35 and                
          36 under 35 U.S.C.                                                          
          § 103(a) as obvious over Westland in view of Izeki further in               
          view of Mita are reversed.                                                  


                                      REVERSED                                        










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007