The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WENDI L. NUSBICKEL
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1434
Application No. 08/159,647
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1-6, 8-15, 17, and 18. We reverse. 1
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to playback
of full motion video. Full motion video playback differs from
1Claims 7 and 16, from which claims 8 and 17 respectively
depend, were canceled. (Paper No. 6 at 2.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007