Appeal No. 1998-1444 Page 8
Application No. 08/543,933
Because Yum teaches outputting a reference voltage from
output terminals rather than from a voltage divider junction,
we are not persuaded that teachings from the prior art would
have suggested the limitations of "a reference voltage
linearly changing with temperature being output from said
voltage divider junction." The examiner fails to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the
rejections of claims 11-13 as obvious over Yum in view of
Buck.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 11-13 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as obvious over Yum in view of Buck is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007