Ex parte GIDDINGS et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1509                                                        
          Application No. 07/811,509                                                  


          operating environment controllers having stored therein a set               
          of addressable control functions accessible by a state vector               
          signal, and operable in response thereto to furnish first                   
          operating point signals to apparatuses respectively associated              
          with said first and second operating environment controllers,               
          the sets of addressable control functions in said first and                 
          second operational [sic, operating] environment controllers                 
          being arranged so that a common state vector signal causes                  
          both of said first and second operating environment                         
          controllers to furnish operating point signals having values                
          which cause the apparatuses respectively associated therewith               
          to act in concert; and                                                      
               communication means connecting said state vector                       
          controller and said plurality of operating environment                      
          controllers for conveying the state vector signal to at least               
          said first and second operating environment controllers.                    


               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Mandl          4,308,911            Jan. 5, 1982                            
          Launey et al. (Launey)      5,086,385            Feb. 4, 1992               
               Claims 1, 3-6, 12-16, 25-28 and 30-32 stand rejected                   
          under 35 U.S.C. 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner              
          cites Launey with regard to claims 1, 3, 12, 13 and 28, adding              
          Mandl with regard to claims 4-6, 14-16, 25-27 and 30-32.                    
               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the                      
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        


                                       OPINION                                        

                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007