Appeal No. 1998-1512
Application No. 07/993,783
page table directory. However, the claim is specific with respect to actions taken in
relation to task scheduling, and the corresponding specifics have not been pointed out in
the MC88200 User’s Manual. Accordingly, we do not sustain the Section 102 rejection of
Claim 17.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of Claim 3 is affirmed.
The rejection of Claim 17 is reversed.
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007