Appeal No. 98-1523 Page 11 Application No. 08/705,744 The appellant argues that Duffee does not disclose clips and that the flange that is disclosed has no axial extension from the seal surface at the bolt end. We agree with the appellant that Duffee does not disclose an axial extension from the seal surface at the bolt end. Although, th gland or plate 20 does interconnects the seal to a housing 14 and as broadly claimed is a clip, and element 20 does indeed include an axial extension 22, this extension is not disposed at the bolt end. Rather the axial extension is from the radial seal surface at the seal end. In view of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 18 and claim 23 dependent therefrom. In addition, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 20, 24, 25 and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being unpatentable as anticipated by Duffee as claims 20 and 25, from which claim 24 and 27 depend, each recite an axial extension from the radial seal surface at the bolt end. We turn finally to the examiner’s rejection of claims 20, 24, 25 and 27 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Malmstrom. The examiner is of the opinion that Malmstrom discloses all the features of the claimedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007