The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KAZUTOSHI SHIMIZUME and MAMORU AKITA
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-1540
Application No. 08/317,390
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 4, 7 and 11-13.
Claims 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 were withdrawn from consideration under a restriction requirement.
Claims 1, 9 and 10 were canceled in response to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 31).
The invention pertains to a servo control system for a disk player.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007