THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRED Y. BRANDON, ROBERT A. CHRISTIANSEN, CURTIS R. DROEGE,
LAWRENCE R. STEWARD, and GARY R. WILLIAMS
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1595
Application No. 08/439,912
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 15-19 and
21. Claims 1-14 and 20 have been indicated by the examiner as allowable, and claim 22
is objected to as being dependent upon rejected claim 21.
We AFFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007