Ex parte FLORIO et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                   Ex parte STEVEN M. FLORIO, JEFFREY P. BURRESS,                     
                        CARL J. COLANGELO, EDWARD C. COUBLE,                          
                                and MARK J. KAPECKAS                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-1616                                  
                             Application No. 08/570,633                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before STAAB, MCQUADE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-23, all the claims currently                  
          pending in the application.                                                 
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a process for                        
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007