Ex parte OHSHIMA et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1998-1695                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/421,309                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            

                     The appellants’ invention relates to an apparatus and method for measuring rotation                  
              quantity of a spherical object.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                    
              reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                    
                     1.     An apparatus for measuring rotation quantity of a spherical object,                           
                     provided with a recording means photographing and recording a rotating                               
                     spherical object from one definite direction as a plurality of stationary circular                   
                     images, an instrumentation means measuring positions of definite two                                 
                     points in each of the plurality of stationary circular images recorded by said                       
                     recording means, and an arithmetic unit calculating rotation quantity of the                         
                     spherical object on each axis of a three-dimensional coordinate-system on                            
                     the basis of the positions of the definite two points in each of the stationary                      
                     circular images.                                                                                     

                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)               4,987,299                    Jan. 22, 1991                       
              Nishiyama et al. (Nishiyama)               5,568,250                    Oct. 22, 1996                       
                                                                              (filed May 26, 1994)                        

                     Claims 1-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                          
              Nishiyama in view of Kobayashi.1                                                                            





                     1The examiner does not state the section of Title 35 upon which the claims are rejected, but         
              references paper number 9 which sets forth 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as the basis of the rejection.                
                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007