Ex parte SHINMOTO - Page 5




             Appeal No. 1998-1735                                                               Page 5                
             Application No. 08/339,980                                                                               


             die it is cooled by a blower as it enters the forming chamber where it is formed into a tube,            
             which gives rise to the establishment of a phase transition point                                        
             (frost line), that is, the point where the plastic changes from liquid to solid state.                   
             According to the appellant, the thickness of the plastic can become non-uniform and its                  
             state unstable if the phase transition point moves from its optimal position, such as might              
             be caused by variations in temperature between day and night and summer and winter                       
             (specification, page 4).  The appellant’s invention solves this problem by providing infrared            
             sensors that directly monitor the position of the frost line in the forming chamber.  If the frost       
             line strays from the desired position, an adjustment is then made in one of the operating                
             parameters of the apparatus to cause it to move back to the desired position.  As                        
             manifested in independent claim 4, the invention comprises, inter alia,                                  
                           means for monitoring phase transition of said molten                                       
                           plastic into solidified plastic film and adjusting operation                               
                           of said apparatus to maintain plastic material phase                                       
                           transition occurrence at a preselected position downstream                                 
                           of said die (emphasis added).                                                              
             According to the examiner, the admitted prior art meets all of the terms of claim                        
             4 except for the means for monitoring the phase transition of the plastic, however, this                 
             would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the teachings of                  
             Lenius.  We do not agree.                                                                                











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007