Ex parte PHILIPS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1736                                                        
          Application 08/282,847                                                      


               a conduit for constraining the fluid to flow in a first                
          direction;                                                                  
               wall means cooperating with said conduit to define a                   
          chamber on at least one side of said conduit and located                    
          alongside the fluid flowing in said first direction, said                   
          chamber being in communication with the interior of said                    
          conduit, said conduit having another side opposite said one                 
          side;                                                                       
               an ultrasonic generating means provided in part in said                
          wall means and in part in said another side of said conduit,                
          said generating means being oriented to create standing                     
          ultrasonic waves in said conduit, said standing ultrasonic                  
          waves having planar node and antinode regions oriented at an                
          angle to the flow of said fluid; and                                        
               a bubble permeable window in said wall means to withdraw               
          bubbles reaching said window.                                               
               The references applied in the final rejection are:                     
               Zenner et al (Zenner)    3,109,721                Nov.  5,             
          1963                                                                        
               Snaper                   3,266,631                Aug. 16,             
          1966                                                                        
               Faulkner et al (Faulkner)4,339,247                Jul. 13,             
          1982                                                                        
               Magill et al (Magill)    92/093354(WIPO)     Jun.  6, 1992             
               The appealed claims stand finally rejected on the                      
          following grounds:                                                          
          (1) Claims 1 to 11, for failure to comply with the “written                 
          description” requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph;               
          (2) Claims 1 to 5, unpatentable over Snaper in view of Zenner,              


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007