Appeal No. 1998-1776
Application No. 08/515,438 Page 8
(3) the examiner’s rejection of claims 11, 20, and 24 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Koch in view of Kaplan
is sustained.
(4) the examiner’s rejection of claim 23 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Koch in view of Kaplan is not
sustained.
REMAND
Finally, we remand this case to the examiner to clarify the
rejections detailed in note one, supra.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007