Ex parte THOMPSON - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-1795                                                        
          Application No. 08/485,682                                                  
                    Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102                                   
               We note that a prior art reference anticipates the                     
          subject of a claim when the reference discloses every feature               
          of the claimed invention, either explicitly or inherently (see              
          Hazani v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 126 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d                
          1358, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 1997) and RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital                
          Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388                  
          (Fed. Cir. 1984)). Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103                          
               In rejecting a claim under 35 U.S.C. § 103, an examiner                
          is under a burden to make out a prima facie case of                         
          obviousness.  If that burden is met, the burden of going                    
          forward then shifts to the applicant to overcome the prima                  
          facie case with argument and/or evidence.  Obviousness is then              
          determined on the basis of the evidence as a whole and the                  
          relative persuasiveness of the arguments.  See In re Oetiker,               
          977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In              
          re Hedges, 783 F.2d 1038, 1039, 228 USPQ 685, 686 (Fed. Cir.                
          1986); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785, 788               
          (Fed. Cir. 1984); and In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1052, 189              
          USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976).                                                  
               We are further guided by the precedents of our reviewing               
          court, under that while considering any rejection on 35 U.S.C.              
                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007