Ex parte HERMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1803                                                        
          Application 08/409,188                                                      


          The disclosed invention pertains to the projection of                       
          identifying images onto cut parts of a sheet material to                    
          enable the parts to be sequentially removed for subsequent                  
          processing.                                                                 
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A part identification system for temporarily                       
          identifying parts cut from a sheet material, comprising:                    
               (a) a visual signal generator for projecting a subset                  
          identifying image onto a portion of the sheet material;                     
               (b) a label for each part cut from the sheet material,                 
          the label including an association of the cut part with a                   
          given subset of parts; and                                                  
               (c) a labeling program for accessing the labels, grouping              
          members of the given subset and directing the subset                        
          identifying image to identify members of the given subset in                
          the cut sheet material.                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Gerber et al. (Gerber)             4,583,181     Apr. 15, 1986              
          Campbell, Jr. et al. (Campbell)    5,172,326     Dec. 15, 1992              
          Claims 1-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Campbell in view                
          of Gerber.                                                                  
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for                


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007