Appeal No. 1998-1825
Application No. 08/658,014
Martin 3,618,870 Nov. 9,
1971
Slezak 3,899,143 Aug. 12,
1975
Keilhack et al. 3,934,837 Jan. 27,
1976
(Keilhack)
Asar Madhu P. et al. 4,317,695 Mar. 2,
1982
(Asar)
Claims 8, 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Huck in view of Asar.
Claims 9 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Huck in view of Asar as applied to
claim 8 above, and further in view of Martin or Slezak.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Huck in view of Asar and Martin or
Slezak as applied to claim 9 above, and further in view of
Keilhack.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007