Ex parte SEKSARIA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                               Paper No. 32           


                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                                      Ex parte                                        
                     ARUN K. SEKSARIA, and WILLIAM C. JONES JR.                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         Appeal No. 1998-1878                                         
                             Application No. 08/543,734                               
                                  ________________                                    
                                HEARD: March 8, 2000                                  
                                  ________________                                    


          Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 6, 7, 16 and 17.  Claims 8 through 10 and               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007