The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GRAHAM D. TATTERSALL
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1903
Application No. 08/353,258
____________
HEARD: November 29, 2000
____________
Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 8, 11 through 15, 17, and 21.
Claims 18 through 20 and 22 have been allowed, and claims 9,
10, and 16 have been objected to as depending from rejected
base claims.
Appellant's invention relates to a pattern recognition
device and method of training such a device in which the input
digital signal values are encoded. The code used either is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007