THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NIKOLAOS GEORGITSIS and NILS ROSE
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1912
Application No. 08/780,744
____________
HEARD: May 3, 2000
____________
Before MCCANDLISH, STAAB, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-22, all the claims pending in the
application.
Appellants' invention pertains to a method of
transferring successive severed blanks into discrete
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007