Appeal No. 1998-1931
Application No. 08/395,411
the selection of the type of wheel disclosed by Fowlkes for
use with a roller skier like that of Goodwin comes not from
the applied teachings themselves but from inappropriate
reliance upon appellant’s own teaching. It is for this reason
that the respective rejections of appellant’s claims must be
reversed. Our review of the patents to Peters and Hill
reveals to us that they do not overcome the deficiency of the
other applied art already discussed.
In summary, this panel of the board has reversed each of
the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007