Appeal No. 1998-1942 Page 5
Application No. 08/530,254
Claim 41 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the
appellants regard as the invention.
Claims 23-26, 30-36 and 41-43 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Mallinen in view of
Kessel and Ermyr.
Claims 27-29, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Mallinen in view of Kessel and
Ermyr as applied to claims 23 and 25 above, and further in
view of Braas.
Claims 39 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Mallinen in view of Kessel and Ermyr
as applied to claims 23 above, and further in view of
Whitsett.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007