Ex parte TRAN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1974                                                        
          Application 07/415,923                                                      


               means in communication with said heating zone and said                 
          heating means for controlling the temperature within said zone              
          to ±0.5EC;                                                                  
               means connected to said insulated vessel at said entrance              
          opening thereof for preventing convection currents around said              
          preform but allowing said preform to move through said means                
          and into said heating zone;                                                 


               means for moving said preform along its longitudinal axis              
          into said heating zone at a predetermined speed;                            
               means for passing a stream of reactive gas around said                 
          preform and fiber so as to flush the surfaces of said preform               
          and fiber with said reactive gas, thereby removing                          
          contaminants therefrom by chemical reaction and elimination of              
          air; and                                                                    
               means for pulling said fiber from said preform.                        
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Siegmund                      3,890,127          June 17, 1975              
          Kaiser                        4,030,901          June 21, 1977              
          Kawashima et al. (Kawashima)  4,249,925          Feb. 10, 1981              
          The following rejections are before us on appeal:                           
          1. Claims 1, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                   
          as being unpatentable over the teachings of Siegmund.1                      
          2. Claims 1, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102                   
          as anticipated by the disclosure of Kaiser, or in the                       

               1The alternative final rejection of these claims under 35              
          U.S.C. § 102 was withdrawn in the answer.                                   
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007