The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM C. DODT, JERRY L. DONZE, JOHN C. OWENS,
BRIAN P. EGAN, RALPH L. BUTTS,
and DONALD R. SCHENCK
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2017
Application No. 08/802,216
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of Claims 13-24, which are all the claims remaining in the application.
We reverse.
1Appellants waived oral hearing in the fax communication filed October 3, 2000 (Paper No. 34).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007