Ex parte KRAMER - Page 1




                        THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                 
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                 today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                  
                 journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                                                                 Paper No. 19                        

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                        ________________                                             
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                     
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                        ________________                                             
                                    Ex parte BARRY L. KRAMER                                         
                                        ________________                                             
                                      Appeal No. 1998-2051                                           
                                     Application 08/426,814                                          
                                        ________________                                             
                                     HEARD:  APRIL 19, 2000                                          
                                        ________________                                             
           Before CALVERT, PATE and HANLON, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
           PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                            

                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 20                             
           and 21.  These are the only claims remaining in the                                       
           application.                                                                              
                 The claimed invention is directed to an over-the-                                   
           guidewire catheter.  The novel feature of the catheter is a                               
                                                -1-                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007