Ex parte SEKI - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-2064                                                        
          Application 08/710,551                                                      


          female thread and an upper surface of the lower member, the                 
          examiner considers that since the female nut 74 of Becker                   
          abuts the lower housing member 10, “the logical place to                    
          install such spring means is between the nut and the lower                  
          member as required . . .” (final rejection, page 2).  The                   
          examiner further explains (answer, pages 4-5) that Markus is                
          only relied upon to show that one skilled in the art of                     
          mechanical devices is aware that transmission elements can be               
          spring mounted in order to absorb shocks.  In addition, the                 
          examiner considers (answer, page 5) that one skilled in the                 
          art would be apprised of the desirability of reducing shock                 
          loads on the transmission elements of Becker by Becker’s                    
          disclosure at column 6, lines 19-26.  The examiner                          
          characterizes this portion of Becker’s disclosure as teaching               
          that low-friction, high-torque nut 74 is used to minimize the               
          possibility that the threads of the spline shaft 26 might be                
          stripped under the high impact                                              


          driving forces generated by the actuating press.  Thus, the                 
          examiner concludes that the suggestion for making the                       


                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007