Ex parte TOMITA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2201                                                        
          Application No. 08/571,702                                                  

          a tire.                                                                     


               Claims 12 and 13 are the only independent claims on                    
          appeal, and they read as follows:                                           
               12. A method of reading and writing of a transponder                   
          containing a rod antenna which is arranged at an inner surface              
          of a tire and an axial direction of the rod antenna is along                
          the circumferential direction of the tire, comprising the                   
          steps of; using an external rod antenna for receiving and                   
          transmitting to the transponder in the tire, positioning said               
          external rod antenna such that an axial line of the external                
          rod antenna is along the circumferential direction of the                   
          tire; moving the external rod antenna along the                             
          circumferential direction, and reading and writing to and from              
          said transponder from outside of the tire.                                  

               13. A device for reading and writing of a transponder                  
          located inside a tire from a position outside the tire                      
          comprising; a rod antenna portion for receiving signals from                
          and transmission of signals to the transponder and a main body              
          for performing processing of a signal, wherein the rod antenna              
          portion is connected to the main body through a stick which is              
          generally perpendicularly joined to the rod antenna portion.                
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Pollack et al. (Pollack)           5,181,975                Jan.            
          26, 1993                                                                    
               Claims 12, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          102(b) as being anticipated by Pollack.                                     
               Claims 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Pollack.                                         
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007