Ex parte STIPPICK - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2242                                                        
          Application No. 08/430,937                                                  

          a distillation or flash column at an oil refinery.                          
               Claim 15, reproduced below, is further illustrative of                 
          the claimed subject matter.                                                 
               15. A method of providing support to a tray comprised of               
          one or more tray panels, said method comprising providing each              
          said tray panel with equidistantly spaced stiffeners located                
          perpendicular to and connected to the bottom surface of said                
          tray panel and positioned in a manner that said stiffeners                  
          cooperate to form a continuous and orthogonal grill under said              
          tray.                                                                       
               The references listed below have been relied upon by the               
          examiner to support rejections under sections 102 and 103:                  
          Kohn                          2,664,280                Dec. 29,             
          1953                                                                        
          Thrift                   3,056,592                Oct.  2, 1962             
          DiNicolantonio et al.    4,133,852                Jan.  9, 1979             
          (DiNicolantonio)                                                            
          Matsumoto et al.         5,431,366                Jul. 11, 1995             
          (Matsumoto)                        (filed Apr. 28, 1994)                    
          The admitted prior art as set forth on pages 5 through 6 of                 
          the instant specification and Figure 2.                                     

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly                  
          point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which                     
          appellant regards as the invention.                                         
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007