Ex parte KYDONIEUS et al. - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 1998-2392                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/338,917                                                                                                             


                 sup- port a lack of enablement rejection.  Simply stated, the                                                                          
                 Wilfong teaching  (a moisture barrier layer comprised of a3                                                                                                         
                 mesophase propylene-based material), relied upon by the exam-                                                                          
                 iner, does not prove that appellants’ claimed invention would                                                                          
                 not have been enabled by the underlying disclosure.  Appel-                                                                            
                 lants rely upon an “oriented” liquid crystal polymer that is                                                                           
                 disclosed as providing the greatest contribution to gas imper-                                                                         
                 meability (specification, page 3, lines 25 through 29).                                                                                
                 Further, the specification                                                                                                             




                 (page 14) supports the noted low permeability attribute of an                                                                          
                 oriented liquid crystal polymer layer by the comparative                                                                               
                 results found in “TABLE 1 - OXYGEN PERMEATION” of Example 1.                                                                           
                 In light of the above, this panel of the board concludes that                                                                          
                 the rejection lacks proof that the claimed subject matter,                                                                             
                 inclusive of an “oriented” liquid crystal polymer layer, is                                                                            
                 based upon an underlying disclosure that is nonenabling.                                                                               




                          3U.S. Patent No. 5,496,295.                                                                                                   
                                                                           5                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007