THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LARRY C. GUNDLACH, GARY R. SKAAR, DENNIS G. FLISRAM, KENNETH J.
MEPHAM and TIMOTHY WATSON
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2415
Application No. 08/751,7981
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 10, 2000
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed November 18, 1996. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application No. 08/328,213, filed October 25, 1994, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application No. 08/213,494, filed March 14, 1994, issued April 11, 1995 as U.S. Patent No. 5,404,777; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/968,622, filed October 29, 1992, issued Jun. 14, 1994 as U.S. Patent No. 5,320,014.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007