THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ARTHUR C. KECK
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-2442
Application No. 08/155,987
______________
HEARD: JULY 11, 2000
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 41
and 44. Claims 32 to 40, 42, 43 and 45 to 48, the other
claims remaining in the application, have been allowed.
The appealed claims are drawn to a method of making a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007