THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 10 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte DANIEL T. MacLAUCHLAN _____________ Appeal No. 1998-2443 Application No. 08/704,956 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, BARRETT and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claim 21, the sole claim pending in the application. The invention is directed to a method for determining a liquid level in a container using an electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT). The method is applied to containers having a thin metal wall. Because the thin wall is much more compliant than 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007