Appeal No. 1998-2494
Application No. 08/521,363
Claims 8-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Murayama in view of Gill. Since each of dependent claims 8-10 contain at least the
limitations of claim 1, and Gill does not remedy the deficiencies we find in Murayama, we
do not sustain the rejection of claims 8-10.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-17 is reversed.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007