Ex parte YAMADA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-2502                                                        
          Application No. 08/525,007                                                  


          USPQ2d 1845 (Fed. Cir. 1994).  Appellants cite this case at                 
          page 2 of the reply brief and contend that the examiner “has                
          failed to identify any structure in the reference identical to              
          that disclosed by appellants for performing that function, and              
          has failed to identify any structure equivalent thereto for                 
          performing that function.”                                                  


























                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007