Ex parte CHEN et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
            Ex parte MING-SYAN CHEN, DILIP D. KANDLUR and PHILIP SHI-LUNG             
          YU                                                                          
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-2579                                  
                               Application 08/350,195                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative                 
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 7, 8 and 10.                  
          Claims 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9 have been cancelled.  Claims 11 and 12              
          have been indicated by the examiner to contain allowable                    


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007