Appeal No. 1998-2605 Application 08/278,612 Sakai in view of Takahashi fail to teach or suggest recording any data in a TOC or elsewhere which would either permit or inhibit recording data of any kind and, more importantly, recording data in a management area which would inhibit a reproducing or recording of the video data when only the audio data are to be recorded in or reproduced from the recording area. Sakai's and Takahashi's control codes neither permit nor inhibit recording at all and only designate the type of segment which can be selected, by means of a switch, for exclusive reproduction. Sakai in view of Takahashi do not prevent an exclusively audio recording apparatus from mistakenly recording over a video only recorded section of the disc, as does the present invention. In accordance with the teachings of the secondary reference to Takahashi, the respective audio only, video only, or audio and video reproduction modes are respectively determined by the switches 101 through 103 as a part of the keyboard 60 in Figure 1 as noted at column 2, lines 59 through 62 and column 4, lines 58 through 60. Again, from our study of Takahashi, we agree with appellant's views expressed in the paragraph bridging pages 4 and 5 of the reply brief as reproduced here: Therefore, the system controller 40 of Takahashi does not use the stored track number to identify whether or not a "second management data" is present because (1) in Takahashi there are only one set of control codes for the audio data (whether or not it is associated with video data) and no additional control codes ("second management data") for the video data and (2) the inhibition of reproducing the video data is determined by the mode setting switches 101-103, not byPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007